An overly in-depth analysis of congressional acronym usage in bill names.
By Noah Veltman Twitter: @veltman Email: noah@noahveltman.com

Highlights

Most acronym-crazed legislators

The most prolific acronymmers in congress are:

The percentage leaders, with a minimum of 10 bills sponsored, are:

For the complete list, see Legislators.

Sassiest acronyms

Most acronym bills are pretty benign, like the Financial Literacy for Youth (FLY) Act, or even a bit lighthearted, like the Robo Calls Off Phones (Robo COP) Act. But sometimes members of Congress use an acronym to make a point, like:

Recycling acronyms

Some acronyms are more popular than others. The most popular word, SAFE, is used 131 times, meaning such things as:

  • Screening Applied Fairly and Equitably
  • Secure Access to Firearms Enhancement
  • Screening Applied Fairly and Equitably
  • Security Against Foreclosures and Education
  • Security and Accountability For Every
  • Swift Approval, Full Evaluation
  • Security and Fairness Enhancement
  • Stop Abuse for Every
  • Safe, Accountable, Fair, and Efficient
  • Security and Financial Empowerment

Other popular words include CARE, FAIR, STOP, HELP, HOPE, DREAM, and PROTECT.

Relevance

Most acronyms in bill titles directly relate to the subject of the bill, like the Arsenic Prevention and Protection from Lead Exposure in Juice (APPLE Juice) Act.

But some seem like complete non sequiturs. Perhaps the biggest puzzle is the Build America Bonds Extension for Rural and Urban Transportation and Highways Act (BABE RUTH) Act. There's no evidence that the sponsor, Rep. Laura Richardson (D-CA), is even a Yankees fan.

Scrabble scores

The bills with the highest Scrabble scores (legal Scrabble words only) are:

Sort by: Acronym billsName
Name# sponsored
Details
Sort by: FrequencyWordLength
Word# of bills
Details

About the Data

This analysis looks at the use of acronyms in the names of bills introduced by the US Senate and House of Representatives. The raw source data comes from the GovTrack Bulk Data API, which has structured data on bills introduced since 1973. It was processed using a lot of regular expressions, SQL queries, Python scripts, and time. Want to play with the raw-ish data yourself? Download it here.

What counts as an acronym?

Everyone put your pedant hats on for a second. This analysis is actually mostly concerned with backronyms, not general acronyms. It looks at cases where a bill was named in a way that created a purposeful acronym as an abbreviated title, and the resulting acronym has no particular significance besides being a catchy nickname for the bill. Examples of this include:

In many cases, a bill has an acronym in the title but is not included. The main reasons for this are:

  • The acronym has no intrinsic meaning. An example of this would be USDA or FBI (if you still have your pedant hat on, you may also realize that these are technically initialisms, not acronyms, because they're pronounced letter by letter. You can take the hat off now!).
  • The acronym refers to a pre-existing thing, like a government department, program, or previous bill. Examples of this would be the TRICARE Affirmation Act, the AIDS Awareness Act, and the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act. We want new coinages only.
  • If a pre-existing acronym in a bill name is created from different words as a reference to the original, that would still be included. An example of this is the Instituting Responsible Spending (IRS) Act, which requires fees collected by the IRS to be deposited in the Treasury as general receipts.

Complications

Members of Congress are unendingly creative with their acronyms. They vary the spelling (the SAAAVE Act), pick and choose which letters to take from constituent words (the Clear Law Enforcement for Criminal Alien Removal Act, or CLEAR), add punctuation (the POLAR-C Act), make hybrid acronym phrases (the COPS and KIDS Act), and just generally confound any ability to extract meaningful acronyms with 100% accuracy.

You cannot discard known acronyms out of hand, because of bills that coin them anew, like the New Aid for Trustworthy, Affordable (NAFTA) Drugs Act, which concerns drug imports from Canada and Mexico.

Although I try to exclude reauthorizations and amendments to old bills, there are still many duplicates, from the same bill getting reintroduced over and over.

Sometimes a bill's acronym doesn't look like it has any meaning until you squint and really think about it, like an inscrutable vanity license plate.

Some bill titles include random uppercase words that have nothing to do with the initials.

It's not always clear whether an acronym is an intentional coinage; the fact that the result is word-like may be incidental.

"What counts as an acronym?" sounds like a pretty simple question until you start exploring this data.

The bottom line: this data is about as accurate as it can be, probably 98%, but keep in mind that it's not perfect. If you find any issues, let me know!